Monthly Archives: August 2016

27
August 2016

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Deferred Inspection sites will correct errors recorded by CBP officers on arrival documents issued at the time of entry to the U.S., such as an improper nonimmigrant classification, inaccurate biographical information, or an incorrect period of admission. See https://www.cbp.gov/document/guidance/deferred-inspection-sites#)

Generally, corrections must be requested by the individual appearing in-person at a local Deferred Inspection office. However, if you entered the U.S. through certain designated ports of entry/Deferred Inspection sites, or are currently located within the area served by a designated site, it may be possible to bypass the in-person appearance and obtain corrected documents via email.

The following is a sample list of documents and information that may be requested:

 Details regarding your most recent entry: date of admission, class of admission, and port of entry;

 I-94 record showing most recent admission;

 Copy of the applicant’s passport biographical page;

 Copy of the applicant’s visa stamp AND admission/entry stamp for last admission into the U.S.;

 Form I-797 / Notice of Approval or Receipt from USCIS; and/or

 Form G-28 signed by the applicant/beneficiary.

Contact Us

 

26
August 2016

What to Do at a Site Visit

 

1. Be alert and aware of the possibility of a site visit at the beneficiary’s work location, even if the work location is at a third party worksite. It is important that H-1B/L-1 employers have policies and procedures in place in case of an FDNS inspection. Human resource departments, staff, and company signatories should be aware of the potential for unannounced site visits and should be prepared to follow the employer’s response plan.

2. Be 100% confident that everything included in the H-1B or L-1 petition is accurate.

3. Ask for and record the credentials of the inspector. The employer should record the name, title, and contact information of the inspector to ensure that any post-visit communications are directed toward the appropriate agent.

4. Make sure the person who signs the petitions (and/or their assistant) knows where to find copies of the petitions quickly and to the extent possible, to review those petitions before meeting with the inspector.

5. Remember that material changes to job duties, and in the case of H-1Bs, changes to work location, require amended petitions.

6. If there are discrepancies between pay stubs and the salary listed on the I-129 petition, be ready with a complete explanation. For example, some L-1 companies pay part of the beneficiary’s salary through the foreign employer, which is an acceptable practice.

7. Contact your attorney immediately if a site visit occurs.

8. Write a detailed description of what happened immediately after the visit.

9. If you are unsure of an answer to a question, ask for additional time and offer to follow-up with the officer, rather than guessing.

Contact Us

 

26
August 2016

Here is a breakdown of the costs and forms involved in the international entrepreneur visa. DHS estimates that 2,940 entrepreneurs could be eligible for parole annually. Each applicant for parole would face a total filing cost—including the application form fee, biometric filing fee, travel costs, and associated opportunity costs—of $1,480, resulting in a total cost of $4,349,827 (undiscounted) for the first full year the rule could take effect and any subsequent year. Additionally, dependent family members (spouses and children) seeking parole with the principal applicant would be required to file an Application for Travel Document (Form I-131) and submit biographical information and biometrics.

DHS estimates approximately 3,234 dependent spouses and children could seek parole based on the base estimate of 2,940 principal applicants. Each spouse and child 14 years of age and older seeking parole would face a total cost of $550 per applicant, for a total aggregate cost of $1,779,604. 3 Additionally, spouses who apply for work authorization via a Form I-765 application would incur a total additional cost of $416.20 each.

Contact Us

Based on the same number of entrepreneurs, the estimated 2,940 spouses would incur total costs of $1,223,630 (undiscounted). The total cost of the rule to include direct filing costs and monetized non-filing costs is estimated to be $7,353,061 annually. DHS anticipates that establishing a parole process for those entrepreneurs who stand to provide a significant public benefit would advance the U.S. economy by enhancing innovation, generating capital investments, and creating jobs.DHS does not expect significant negative consequences or labor market impacts from this rule; indeed, DHS believes this proposal would encourage entrepreneurs to pursue business opportunities in the United States rather than abroad, which can be expected to generate significant scientific, research and development, and technological impacts that could create new products and produce positive spillover effects to other businesses and sectors.

The impacts stand to benefit the economy by supporting and strengthening high growth, job-creating businesses in the United States.

 

 

 

26
August 2016

DHS further proposes that if parole is granted, the entrepreneur would be authorized for employment incident to the grant of parole, but only with respect to the entrepreneur’s start-up entity. The entrepreneur’s spouse and children, if any, would not be authorized for employment incident to the grant of parole, but the entrepreneur’s spouse, if paroled into the United States pursuant to 8 CFR 212.19, would be permitted to apply for employment authorization consistent with proposed 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(34).

As noted, the purpose of the proposed parole process is to provide qualified entrepreneurs of high-potential start-up entities in the United States with the improved ability to conduct research and development and expand the entities’ operations in the United States so that our nation’s economy may benefit from such development and expansion, including through increased capital expenditures, innovation and job creation.

Contact Us

Finally, DHS is proposing conforming changes to the employment authorization regulations at 8 CFR 274a.12(b) and (c), the employment eligibility verification regulations at 8 CFR 274a.2(b), and fee regulations at 8 CFR 103.7(b)(i). The proposed rule would amend 8 CFR 274a.12(b) by: (1) adding entrepreneur parolees to the classes of aliens authorized for employment incident to their immigration status or parole, and (2) providing for temporary employment authorization for those applying for re-parole.

The proposed rule would amend 8 CFR 274a.12(c) by extending eligibility for employment authorization to the spouse of an entrepreneur paroled into the United States under 8 CFR 212.19. The proposed rule would amend 8 CFR 274a.2(b) by designating the entrepreneur’s foreign passport and Arrival/Departure Record (Form I-94) indicating entrepreneur parole as acceptable evidence for employment eligibility verification (Form I-9) purposes. Finally, the proposed rule would amend 8 CFR 103.7(b)(i) by including the fee for the new proposed application form.

 

26
August 2016

Washington—El Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de Estados Unidos (USCIS, por sus siglas en inglés) propuso hoy una nueva regla que permitirá ciertos empresarios internacionales ser considerados al permiso de ingreso (ingreso temporal estar en los Estados Unidos), de modo que puedan empezar o desarrollar su empresa aquí en los Estados Unidos.

Lea la versión avanzada de la notificación de reglamentación propuesta “Regla de Empresario Internacional” (International Entrepreneur Rule). Una vez la notificación de regla propuesta sea publicada en el Registro Federal, el público tendrá 45 días a partir de la fecha de publicación para hacer sus comentarios. Para enviar sus comentarios, siga las instrucciones en la notificación.

“La economía estadounidense se ha beneficiado por mucho tiempo de las contribuciones de los inmigrantes y sus empresas, desde Main Street hasta a Silicon Valley,” dijo el Director León Rodríguez. “Esta regla, una vez finalizada, ayudará al crecimiento de nuestra economía con la expansión de las opciones de inmigración para empresarios extranjeros que cumplan ciertos criterios como crear empleos, atraer inversiones y generar ingresos en los Estados Unidos”.

La regla propuesta permitirá al Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS, por sus siglas en inglés) usar su autoridad estatutaria discrecional para otorgar permisos a empresarios de las empresas emergentes cuya permanencia en EE.UU. proveerá un beneficio público por medio del potencial sustancial y demostrado de crecimiento rápido del negocio y la creación de empleos. Bajo esta regla propuesta, DHS puede conceder permiso de ingreso sobre una base caso por caso, a empresarios elegibles de empresas emergentes:

  • Que tengan interés significativo como propietarios en la empresa emergente (un mínimo de 15%) y tengan un papel activo y central en sus operaciones
  • Que se hayan fundado en los Estados Unidos en los últimos tres años y
  • Cuyo comienzo demuestre potencial sustancial para el crecimiento rápido del negocio y la creación de empleos, como se evidencie por:
    • La recepción de capital de inversión significativo (mínimo de $345,000) por parte de inversores cualificados establecidos con un récord de inversiones exitosas en los Estados Unidos
    • Premios o becas significativos (mínimo de $100,000) de parte de los gobiernos federal, estatal o local o
    • Satisfagan parcialmente uno o dos de los criterios arriba en adición a otra evidencia fiable y convincente de que la empresa emergente tiene potencial sustancial de crecimiento rápido y de crear empleos.

Contáctanos

Bajo la regla propuesta, a los empresarios se les puede otorgar una estadía inicial de hasta dos años para supervisar y hacer crecer su empresa emergente en los Estados Unidos. Una petición subsiguiente del permiso (hasta tres años adicionales) será considerada solamente si el empresario y la empresa emergente continúan proveyendo un beneficio público como se evidencia en aumentos significativos en la inversión de capital, ingresos o puestos de trabajo.

La notificación de esta regla propuesta en el Registro Federal invita a un periodo de 45 días de comentarios públicos, luego de lo cual USCIS evaluará los comentarios recibidos. La regla propuesta no entra en efecto con la publicación de la propuesta de reglamentación. Entrará en vigor en la fecha indicada en la regla final cuando sea publicada en el registro Federal.

Para información acerca de USCIS y sus programas, visite www.uscis.gov/espanol

 

 

26
August 2016

WASHINGTON—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is proposing a new rule, which would allow certain international entrepreneurs to be considered for parole (temporary permission to be in the United States) so that they may start or scale their businesses here in the United States.

Read the advance version of the notice of proposed rulemaking: International Entrepreneur Rule. Once the notice of proposed rulemaking is published in the Federal Register, the public will have 45 days from the date of publication to comment. To submit comments, follow the instructions in the notice.

“America’s economy has long benefitted from the contributions of immigrant entrepreneurs, from Main Street to Silicon Valley,” said Director León Rodríguez. “This proposed rule, when finalized, will help our economy grow by expanding immigration options for foreign entrepreneurs who meet certain criteria for creating jobs, attracting investment and generating revenue in the U.S.”

The proposed rule would allow the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to use its existing discretionary statutory parole authority for entrepreneurs of startup entities whose stay in the United States would provide a significant public benefit through the substantial and demonstrated potential for rapid business growth and job creation. Under this proposed rule, DHS may parole, on a case-by-case basis, eligible entrepreneurs of startup enterprises:

  • Who have a significant ownership interest in the startup (at least 15 percent) and have an active and central role to its operations;
  • Whose startup was formed in the United States within the past three years; and
  • Whose startup has substantial and demonstrated potential for rapid business growth and job creation, as evidenced by:
    • Receiving significant investment of capital (at least $345,000) from certain qualified U.S. investors with established records of successful investments;
    • Receiving significant awards or grants (at least $100,000) from certain federal, state or local government entities; or
    • Partially satisfying one or both of the above criteria in addition to other reliable and compelling evidence of the startup entity’s substantial potential for rapid growth and job creation.

Contact Us

Under the proposed rule, entrepreneurs may be granted an initial stay of up to two years to oversee and grow their startup entity in the United States. A subsequent request for re-parole (for up to three additional years) would be considered only if the entrepreneur and the startup entity continue to provide a significant public benefit as evidenced by substantial increases in capital investment, revenue or job creation.

The notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register invites public comment for 45 days, after which USCIS will address the comments received. The proposed rule does not take effect with the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking. It will take effect on the date indicated in the final rule when a final rule is published in the Federal Register.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit www.uscis.gov.

(special thank you to USCIS for this information and San Diego Startup Week for sharing the pictures)

 

25
August 2016

What Happens at an FDNS site visit?

When an FDNS inspector appears at the employer premises, he or she will likely ask to speak with the human resources manager or the company official who signed the H-1B petition. During an FDNS site visit, the inspector is typically charged with verifying the existence of the employer, the validity of the information the employer provided in the H-1B or L-1 petition, and whether the foreign national is working in compliance with the terms of the H-1B or L-1 approval.

FDNS may ask to take photographs of the facility to verify its existence, and interview the beneficiary, and supervisors or other personnel to confirm the details of the beneficiary’s physical work area, hours, salary, and duties. In most situations, there is no advance notice of a site visit. Site visits typically take less than one hour and often take significantly less time.

The inspectors may also ask for pay stubs or W-2s and may ask questions regarding the rate of pay, title, and job duties in order to compare that information with the information reflected in the H-1B or L-1 petition and supporting letter. If an FDNS investigator asks questions which are beyond the scope of the petition or would require internal research, it is okay to ask for additional time to respond. If follow-up is required, it is important that the employer quickly respond with the requested information or documentation to ensure that the Compliance Review Report can be completed by the inspector in a timely manner.

If at any point the petitioner or beneficiary indicates an unwillingness to continue, FDNS should end the inspection. However, the inspector will likely complete the Compliance Review Report based only on the information that was gathered before the inspection was terminated and will indicate that the interview was terminated upon request. FDNS may follow-up at a later time.

Contact Us

 

 

24
August 2016

On September 9, 2015, the Department of State and USCIS jointly announced new procedures that will allow individuals who are stuck in the family-based and employment-based immigrant visa backlogs to start their immigrant visa paperwork or apply for adjustment of status before their priority date becomes current and an immigrant visa becomes immediately available.

Update: On September 25, 2015, the Department of State published a revised Visa Bulletin for October, rolling back the “Dates for Filing” for several visa categories. This “Revised September 25, 2015” Visa Bulletin supersedes the previous Visa Bulletin for October, which was published on September 9, 2015.

Please note that the following “Dates for Filing” have changed:

Category (9/9/15)
Filing Date
NEW (9/25/15)
Filing Date
Difference
EB-2 China 5/1/2014 1/1/2013 1 year, 5 months
EB-2 India 7/1/2011 7/1/2009 2 years
EB-3 Philippines 1/1/2015 1/1/2010 5 years
FB-1 Mexico 7/1/1995 4/1/1995 3 months
FB-3 Mexico 10/1/1996 5/1/1995 1 year, 5 months

Therefore, individuals who fall under the above-referenced categories will only be permitted to file for adjustment of status in the month of October if they have a priority date that is earlier than the NEW Filing Date listed in the revised September 25, 2015 Visa Bulletin.

Beginning with the October Visa Bulletin, there are now two charts listing dates for each preference category and country of chargeability: (1) An “Application Final Action Dates” chart (“Final Action Date”); and (2) a “Dates for Filing Applications” chart (“Filing Date”). USCIS has also issued a fact sheet describing the new procedures. Previously, the Visa Bulletin only listed a single chart of cut-off dates, which was the same as the newly labeled “Final Action Date” chart. These changes will impact immigrant visa applicants and adjustment of status applicants as follows:

  • Immigrant Visa Applicants (Consular Processing): Individuals with priority dates earlier than the date listed on the “Filing Date” chart for their preference category and country of chargeability will be notified by the National Visa Center that they may assemble and submit their documentation and begin the immigrant visa application process. However, a final decision on the immigrant visa application cannot take place until the priority date is current (i.e., is earlier than the “Final Action Date”).
  • Adjustment of Status Applicants: Individuals who are in the United States and are eligible for adjustment of status must use the “Final Action Date” chart to determine when they may submit their applications for adjustment of status, unless the Visa Bulletin indicates that they may instead use the “Filing Date” chart. The early “Filing Date” chart may only be used by adjustment applicants if USCIS determines there are sufficient immigrant visas available to support the filing of additional adjustment applications beyond that which would be received under the “Final Action Date” chart.

Contact Us

  • The October 2015 Visa Bulletin permits both family- and employment-based immigrants to use the “Filing Date” chart to file adjustment of status applications with USCIS for the month of October. Thus, individuals who have a priority date earlier than the “Filing Date” cut-off for the month of October may submit an adjustment of status application in October. These individuals will also be able to obtain employment authorization and advance parole as an adjustment applicant. However, please note that there is no guarantee that adjustment applicants will be able to benefit from the earlier “Filing Date” chart in any given month moving forward.

Of particular note:

  • The “Filing Date” for most of the family-based categories is less than 1 year and up to around 2 years earlier than the “Final Action Date,” with the exception of F-1 Philippines with a difference of 4+ years, and F-3 Mexico with a difference of 2+ years.
  • The employment-based categories most impacted by the October Visa Bulletin are:
    • EB-2 India: Final Action Date = 5/1/05; Filing Date = 7/1/11
    • EB-3 Philippines: Final Action Date = 1/1/07; Filing Date = 1/1/15
    • EB-2 China: Final Action Date = 1/1/12; Filing Date = 5/1/14
    • EB-3 China: Final Action Date = 10/15/11; Filing Date = 10/1/13

 

 

24
August 2016

Immigrants all over the country are being targeted in scams. Don’t be one of the victims! Scammers may call or email you, pretending to be a government official. They will say that there is a problem with an application or additional information is required to continue the immigration process. They will then ask for personal and sensitive details, and demand payment to fix any problems.

 

Remember, USCIS officials will never ask for payment over the phone or in an email. If USCIS needs payment, USCIS will mail a letter on official stationery requesting payment.

 

If you receive a scam email or phone call, report it to the Federal Trade Commission at https://1.usa.gov/1suOHSS. If you are not sure if it is a scam, forward the suspicious email to the USCIS Webmaster at uscis.webmaster@uscis.dhs.gov. USCIS will review the emails received and share with law enforcement agencies as appropriate.

 

Visit the Avoid Scams Initiative at uscis.gov/avoidscams for more information on common scams and other important tips. If you have a question about your immigration record, call customer service at 800-375-5283 or make an InfoPass appointment at https://infopass.uscis.gov.

 

Kind Regards,

USCIS Public Engagement Division

 

Contact Us

 

24
August 2016

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began its Administrative Site Visit and Verification Program (ASVVP) in 2009. Under the program, site visits are conducted by the Fraud Detection and National Security directorate (FDNS) of USCIS. FDNS conducts site visits for religious worker petitions, H-1B petitions, and since 2014, L-1 petitions. (Administrative Site Visit and Verification Program (updated 10/30/14), USCIS, https://www.uscis.gov/aboutus/directorates-and-program-offices/fraud-detection-and-national-security/administrative-site-visit-and-verificationprogram.)

An employer that signs Form I-129 agrees that “any supporting evidence submitted may be verified by USCIS through any means determined appropriate by USCIS, including but not limited to, on-site compliance reviews.” FDNS site visits are voluntary, but it is strongly recommended that employers cooperate should one occur. Employers should also be advised to contact their immigration attorney immediately should an FDNS investigation take place. Though most site visits are unannounced and FDNS will not reschedule a visit to accommodate counsel, counsel is permitted to be present if logistically possible and might be permitted to participate via telephone.

Common Red Flags for FDNS Site Investigators:

 

• The beneficiary’s salary in pay statements does not match the amount stated in the petition.

• Reported income on the beneficiary’s Form1040 does not match the beneficiary’s salary, or the beneficiary reports as “self-employed.”

• The address of the beneficiary’s work location in the petition is not an actual work site.

• Virtual offices or empty offices without equipment are listed as the beneficiary’s place of employment.

• The beneficiary lacks a work email or work phone number.

Contact Us