Monthly Archives: January 2016

28
January 2016

Estamos en la Semana de Concientización sobre el Robo de Identidad Fiscal, ¡y queremos que esté vigilante a las estafas fiscales! Lección de hoy: las estafas telefónicas.

¡No sea víctima de personas que le llaman y dicen que trabajan para el Servicio de Rentas Internas (IRS, por sus siglas en inglés)! Ha habido un aumento en las estafas telefónicas, en las que personas agresivas le llaman y amenazan diciéndole que la policía lo arrestará o deportará si no les paga una cantidad de dinero.

 

Aún si usted debe impuestos…

  • IRS NUNCA lo llamará y exigirá un pago inmediato por teléfono.
  • IRS NUNCA intentará amenazarle o intimidarle, ni exigirá un pago a través de una tarjeta de débito prepago, ni le preguntará su número de tarjeta de crédito o débito por teléfono.
  • IRS NUNCA lo amenazará con llamar a la policía o a los agentes de inmigración si no hace un pago.

Si usted recibe una llamada de este tipo, infórmelo al Fiscal General de Administración de Impuestos del Departamento del Tesoro a través del 800-366-4484 o de la página www.titga.gov. También, infórmelo a la Comisión Federal de Comercio en www.ftc.gov/queja.

 

Para más información acerca de las estafas fiscales en inglés, vea este vídeo. Si usted debe impuestos, puede llamar al IRS al 1-800-829-1040 y ellos le pueden ayudar a hacer un plan de pago.

 

Visite uscis.gov/eviteestafas para aprender cómo reconocer y evitar estafas de inmigración y localizar servicios legales autorizados.

25
January 2016

WASHINGTON—Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson has extended Sudan’s designation for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for an additional 18 months due to the ongoing armed conflict and extraordinary and temporary conditions in Sudan that prevent its nationals from safely returning. The extended designation is effective May 3, 2016, through November 2, 2017.

Current TPS Sudan beneficiaries seeking to extend their TPS status must re-register during a 60-day period that runs from January 25, 2016 through March 25, 2016. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) encourages beneficiaries to re-register as soon as possible.

The 18-month extension also allows TPS re-registrants to apply for a new Employment Authorization Document (EAD). Eligible Sudan TPS beneficiaries who re-register during the 60-day period and request a new EAD will receive one with an expiration date of November 2, 2017. USCIS recognizes that some re-registrants may not receive their new EADs until after their current work permits expire. Therefore, USCIS is automatically extending current TPS Sudan EADs bearing a May 2, 2016 expiration date for an additional six months. These existing EADs are now valid through November 2, 2016.

Contact Us

To re-register, current beneficiaries must submit:

Individuals who still have a pending initial TPS Sudan application do not need to submit a new Form I-821. However, if they currently have a TPS-related EAD and want a new work permit, they should submit:

  • Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization;
  • The Form I-765 application fee, regardless of their age; and
  • A copy of the receipt notice for the initial Form I-821 that is still pending.

Additional information about TPS for Sudan—including guidance on eligibility, the application process and where to file—is available at uscis.gov/tps. The Federal Register notice published today contains further details about this extension of TPS for Sudan, including application requirements and procedures, and the six month auto-extension of current Sudan TPS EADs.

USCIS will reject the TPS application of any applicant who fails to submit the required filing fees or a properly documented fee-waiver request. Applicants may request that USCIS waive any fees based on an inability to pay by filing Form I-912, Request for Fee Waiver, or by submitting a written request. Fee-waiver requests must be accompanied by supporting documentation.

All USCIS forms are free. Applicants can download these forms from the USCIS website at uscis.gov/forms or request forms by mail by calling the USCIS Forms Request Line toll-free at 1-800-870-3676.

Applicants seeking information about the status of their cases can check My Case Status Online or call the USCIS National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283 (TDD for the deaf and hard of hearing: 1-800-767-1833).

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow USCIS on Facebook (/uscis), Twitter (@uscis), YouTube (/uscis) and the USCIS blog The Beacon.

 

 

21
January 2016

State Department Office of Press Relations DHS Office of Public Affairs Washington, DC, January 21, 2016

The United States today began implementing changes under the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 (the Act). U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) welcomes more than a million passengers arriving to the United States every day and is committed to facilitating legitimate travel while maintaining the highest standards of security and border protection.

Under the Act, travelers in the following categories are no longer eligible to travel or be admitted to the United States under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP):

  • Nationals of VWP countries who have traveled to or been present in Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria on or after March 1, 2011 (with limited exceptions for travel for diplomatic or military purposes in the service of a VWP country).
  • Nationals of VWP countries who are also nationals of Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria.

These individuals will still be able to apply for a visa using the regular immigration process at their embassies or consulates. For those who need a U.S. visa for urgent business, medical, or humanitarian travel to the United States, U.S. embassies and consulates stand ready to process applications on an expedited basis Beginning January 21, 2016, travelers who currently have valid Electronic System for Travel Authorizations (ESTAs) and who have previously indicated holding dual nationality with one of the four countries listed above on their ESTA applications will have their current ESTAs revoked.

 

Under the new law, the Secretary of Homeland Security may waive these restrictions if he determines that such a waiver is in the law enforcement or national security interests of the United States. Categories of travelers who may be eligible for a waiver include:

 

* Individuals who traveled to Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria on behalf of an international organizations, regional organizations, and sub-national governments on official duty;

* Individuals who traveled to Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria on behalf of a humanitarian NGO on official duty; and

* Individuals who traveled to Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria as a journalist for reporting purposes;

* Individuals who traveled to Iran for legitimate business-related purposes following the conclusion of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (July 14, 2015); and

* Individuals who have traveled to Iraq for legitimate business-related purposes.

 

  • Whether ESTA applicants will receive a waiver will be determined on a case-by-case basis. In addition, we will continue to explore whether and how the waivers can be used for dual nationals of Iraq, Syria, Iran and Sudan.

Any traveler who receives notification that they are no longer eligible to travel under the VWP are still eligible to travel to the United States with a valid nonimmigrant visa issued by a U.S. embassy or consulate. Such travelers will be required to appear for an interview and obtain a visa in their passports at a U.S. embassy or consulate before traveling to the United States.

The new law does not ban travel to the United States, or admission into the United States, and the great majority of VWP travelers will not be affected by the legislation.

An updated ESTA application with additional questions is scheduled to be released in late February 2016 to address exceptions for diplomatic- and military-related travel provided for in the Act.

Information on visa applications can be found at travel.state.gov.<https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en.html>

Current ESTA holders are encouraged to check their ESTA status prior to travel on CBP’s website at esta.cbp.dhs.gov<https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov/esta/>

21
January 2016

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to hear the federal government’s appeal of a decision that blocked President Barack Obama’s executive actions on immigration and experts say the court’s prior deference to the executive branch on immigration issues could give the government a win that allows policies aimed at shielding millions from deportation to go forward.

The court also asked the federal government and states involved in the case to weigh in on whether the executive action guidance runs afoul of the “take care clause” of the Constitution. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the Supreme Court’s taking up the case is significant.

Contact Us

AILA Urges Supreme Court to Affirm Constitutionality of Executive Branch Immigration Powers

“This is an incredibly important moment in the history of immigration reform. The executive branch authority to establish these practices is clearly within the president’s constitutional power and should be affirmed,” said Victor Nieblas Pradis, President of AILA. “The stakes in this case are momentous and whatever the final ruling will be it will go far beyond immigration. No single state should be empowered to thwart the federal government’s nationwide policy decisions. The consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision will be profound.”

In November 2014, President Obama announced a series of immigration policy decisions after Congress failed to pass comprehensive legislation to fix the nation’s broken immigration system. Among them, the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans, or DAPA, would lift the threat of deportation against more than 4 million immigrants who are considered the lowest priority for deportation- parents of U.S. citizens who had no criminal record. Those eligible would be given temporary reprieve from deportation and have the opportunity to apply for work permits.

A group of states, led by Texas, contended he exceeded his presidential powers under the U.S. Constitution and a federal district court judge issued an order blocking DAPA on procedural grounds. A 2-1 decision by a court of appeals panel affirmed the injunction. The Supreme Court has now agreed to hear the case, and a decision is expected in June.

“A decision made in President Obama’s favor would give his administration about seven months to try to roll out the expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA program and the new DAPA initiative,” said Nieblas Pradis. “However, if the Supreme Court rules against Obama’s proposal to expand DACA, then that would likely force the administration to shut down the earlier program, which has benefited almost 800,000 Dreamers since 2012 by granting them quasi-legal status and work permits.”

 

19
January 2016

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the government’s petition for a writ of certiorari in Texas v. United States, and directed the parties to brief and argue “Whether the Guidance violates the Take Care Clause of the Constitution, Art. II, §3.”

The Court agreed on Tuesday to hear the federal government’s appeal of a decision that upheld a block on President Barack Obama’s key executive actions on immigration, setting the stage for one of the biggest immigration fights at the high court in recent years.

AILA welcomed the Court’s decision to take up the case, and urged the Court to affirm the constitutionality of executive branch immigration powers. “[T]he final ruling will … go far beyond immigration, no single state should be empowered to thwart the federal government’s nationwide policy decisions.”

See AILA’s Texas v. United States page for background and resources related to this case.

19
January 2016

Scoop: You Can’t Use These IDs to Get on Base Anymore

Trying to get a base visitor’s pass? If you’re using a Washington State, Minnesota, Illinois, New Mexico or Missouri driver’s license or state ID card alone as your identification, you’re out of luck. According to Defense Department officials, those licenses will soon no longer be accepted as proof of ID — and in some places they are already being rejected.

So what’s going on? We’ve got the low-down.

Who does this impact?

Anyone who wants to get a visitor’s or contractor’s pass and would normally present an ID from one of those states is impacted. That includes service members and military spouses who are getting a pass because they’ve misplaced their ID. (Let’s be honest — it happens). For example I, Amy, have a Washington State driver’s license. If I was to misplace my ID and try get a visitor’s pass so that I could go the ID office or anywhere else, I would not be able to use my driver’s license as my only form of ID. I would either have to drum up a friend with a military ID to bring me on base, or I would have to present a different, acceptable form of ID.

What does this mean?

If you want to get a visitor’s pass (or plan to have someone visiting you get one) or contractor’s pass, and have a card from one of those states, you’re going to need to present a different form of ID. If you’re simply renewing a pass you already have — same story.

What if they aren’t getting a pass and just riding in the car with a DoD ID card holder?

The only time those licenses aren’t accepted is when getting a pass. If they are in the car with a DoD ID card holder (like a spouse ID, a CAC card, Reserve ID, etc.), the gate guard should still accept them, officials told me.

Why is this happening?

A 2005 law required states to step-up their state-issued ID security game, for example making IDs less prone to fraud and giving them a readable chip or magnetic stripe. Some states complied right away. Others, not so much. A handful of states, including California, have been granted extensions as they work to get their rears in gear. And then there’s Washington, Missouri, Illinois, Minnesota and New Mexico — no extensions and now up the proverbial creek.

(This is a sad day for me, by the way. My Washington State driver’s license has “military” printed on it instead of an expiration date, meaning as long as I hold a valid military ID, it never expires and I never have to renew it. I’m locked in time in that photo at 25-years-old. It wasn’t the best hair day, but if you can be 25, who cares? I just don’t want to give it up. … ever.)

My base hasn’t said a word about this. How do I know it’s true here?

Right now Pentagon officials have told me that this new rule is going to impact every base — yet we have seen only a few bases actually issue guidance about it. That means we don’t know what the roll-out will be like everywhere. For example, Joint Base Lewis-McChord officials told me they are still figuring out what to do.

It’s also possible that, like with the change for airline passengers, public outcry could cause officials to backpedal and decide to give an exemption for military bases.

For now, however, know that this is the plan: if, like me, your state-issued ID is from one of these states, you’re out of luck in the pass office.

What kind of IDs do work?

According to several bases that have announced how this is going to work, you can use a passport or a variety of other types of IDs instead of your state driver’s license to get a visitor’s pass (get ready, this list is kind of long): Federal Identification Cards (PIC); Transportation Worker Identification Card; United States Passport or United States Passport Card – Permanent Resident Card/Alien Registration Receipt Card (Form I-551); Foreign passport with a temporary (I-551) stamp or temporary (I-551) printed notation on a machine readable immigrant visa; an employment authorization document that contains a photograph (Form I-766); ID card issued by Federal, State, and Local Government Agencies (must contain photo, name, DOB, gender, height, eye color & address); U.S. Coast Guard Merchant Mariner Legacy Cards; U.S. Coast Guard New Merchant Mariner Credential; Native American Tribal Document.

Additionally, two bases — White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico and Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri — which are both in states with problematic IDs, have said they will still accept the questionable driver’s licenses as long as you can also present one of these supporting forms of ID: original U.S. social security card; U.S. Military or draft record; Certification of Birth Abroad issued by the State Department; U.S. Citizen ID Card; ID card for use of Resident Citizen in the U.S.

Are there any exceptions?

Individual bases might grant one-time exceptions while they spread the word about this change. For example, officials at Fort Leonard Wood said they will allow a one-time exception until January 28. You’re going to have to check with your local base to see if this is true.

What if I have an enhanced driver’s license from one of those states?

Although the Department of Homeland Security has said enhanced driver’s licenses (EDL) from those states are still accepted and in the clear, they also said it’s up to the “individual agencies” as to whether or not they will accept them. The Defense Department has not said whether or not they are going to allow the EDL.

Update: DoD officials just told me EDLs are good to go.

(this information was provided courtesy of American Immigration Lawyer’s Association Military Assistance Program and at https://spousebuzz.com/blog/2016/01/scoop-you-cant-use-these-ids-to-get-on-base-anymore.html)

15
January 2016

El Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS, por sus siglas en inglés) enmendó hoy sus reglamentos para mejorar el programa que da servicio a las clasificaciones de no inmigrantes H-1B, E-3 y CW-1, así como la clasificación de inmigrante EB-1, y eliminar los obstáculos que colocan en desventaja a dichos trabajadores en comparación con trabajadores en situación similar en otras clasificaciones de visas.

La regla final, publicada hoy en el Registro Federal y efectiva el 16 de febrero, revisa las reglamentaciones que afectan a los trabajadores en clasificaciones de no inmigrante en empleos especializados procedentes de Chile, Singapur (H-1B1) y Australia (E-3), en la clasificación de inmigrante de primera preferencia basada en el empleo (EB-1) para profesores e investigadores; y los trabajadores no inmigrantes en clasificación de Trabajador Transicional solo de la Mancomunidad de las Islas Marianas del Norte (CNMI, por sus siglas en inglés) (CW-1).

En específico, esta regla final enmienda las reglamentaciones de DHS según descritas a continuación:

  • DHS incluye las clasificaciones H-1B1 y E-3 principales en la lista de clases de nacionales extranjeros autorizados a permanecer como empleados dependientes de su estatus con un empleador específico. Esto significa que esos no inmigrantes H-1B1 y E-3 principales están autorizados para trabajar para el empleador que los patrocina sin tener que solicitar un permiso de trabajo.
  • DHS autoriza la continuación de empleo con el mismo empleador hasta un máximo de 240 días para aquellos no inmigrantes H-1B1 y E-3 principales cuyo estatus haya caducado mientras su empleador tiene pendiente una petición de estadía que presentó oportunamente.
  • DHS provee esta misma autorización de continuación de empleo para los no inmigrantes CW-1 cuyo estatus haya caducado mientras su empleador tiene pendiente la petición de extensión de estadía con el Formulario I-129CW, Petición de Trabajador No Inmigrante Transicional solo CNMI, presentado oportunamente.
  • Las reglamentaciones existentes sobre los procedimientos de presentación de extensiones de estadía y peticiones de cambio de estatus ahora incluyen las clasificaciones de no inmigrante E-3 y H-1B1.
  • Los empleadores que solicitan una visa EB-1 para profesores e investigadores destacados ahora pueden presentar evidencia inicial comparable a otros tipos de evidencia previamente listados en 8 CFR 204.5(i)(3(i), al igual que algunas categorías de inmigración basada en el empleo para las cuales ya se permite enviar evidencia comparable.

Esta regla final no impone costos adicionales a los empleadores, trabajadores o cualquier entidad gubernamental. Más aún, el cambio realizado a las reglamentaciones de autorización de empleo de los no inmigrantes H-1B1 y E-3 los equipara con otros trabajadores en situaciones similares en otras categorías de trabajadores no inmigrantes. Además, esta regla disminuye las posibles interrupciones en el empleo para los patronos estadounidenses de los trabajadores no inmigrante H-1B1, E-3 y CW-1. Finalmente, DHS espera que este cambio ayude a los empleadores estadounidenses a reclutar profesiones e investigadores sobresalientes en categoría EB1, al expandir la gama de evidencia que los empleadores estadounidenses pueden proveer para apoyar sus peticiones.

“Nos esforzamos constantemente por mejorar nuestros procesos y asegurar un acceso justo y consistente a los beneficios de inmigración”, dijo el director de USCIS, León Rodríguez. “Esta regla de Mejoramiento de Oportunidades elimina los obstáculos innecesarios que colocan en desventaja a los trabajadores y será beneficiosa tanto para los empleadores como para los trabajadores”.

Para más información acerca de USCIS y sus programas, por favor visite www.uscis.gov/es o síganos en Twitter (@USCIS) e (@USCIS_ES), YouTube (/USCIS), Facebook (/USCIS.ES), y el blog en español de USCIS Compás.

Contáctanos

 

14
January 2016

Mark of Excellence

Board Certification is a mark of excellence and a distinguishing accomplishment.

Within the Texas legal community, Board Certification means an attorney has substantial, relevant experience in a select field of law as well as demonstrated, and tested, special competence in that area of law.

A Distinguished Few

There are more than 70,000 attorneys licensed to practice in Texas. Only 7,000 are Board Certified.

Board Certified lawyers earn the right to publicly represent themselves as a specialist in a select area of the law. In fact, they are the only attorneys allowed by the State Bar of Texas to do so. This designation sets them apart as being an attorney with the highest, public commitment to excellence in their area of law.

The process is voluntary and can only take place after an attorney has been in practice for five years, with a minimum of three years experience in the specialty area.

Moreover, Board Certification is not a one-time event. It requires an ongoing involvement in the specialty area which is periodically substantiated with references from peers in that field. It also requires annual professional refreshment through TBLS approved, continuing legal education course work to stay abreast of current trends in law.

Easy to Find

Few Texas attorneys have answered the challenge laid down 36 years ago by the Supreme Court of Texas and the State Bar of Texas to “…serve the public interest and advance the standards of the legal profession.”

We invite you to connect with a Board Certified attorney today.

(the information above has been provided by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and can be found at https://www.tbls.org/WhyChooseBoardCertified.aspx)

 

13
January 2016


Emergency rulings reveal indefensible deportation strategy for vulnerable Central American families

January 13, 2016

Washington D.C. – In the last week, 121 mothers and children were brought to the South Texas Residential Family Center in Dilley, Texas, after being rounded up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project reviewed the cases of 13 families, filed appeals for 12, and won stays of removal from the Board of Immigration Appeals for all 12 families – 33 mothers and children. While this is a major victory for these families, the troubling fact remains that many, who very likely also had claims for relief, were swiftly deported without the chance to consult with CARA staff or volunteers. The 12 families for whom CARA obtained stays were fleeing extreme domestic violence or targeted for recruitment, kidnapping, assault, or extortion by transnational criminal organizations.

We now call on the Obama Administration to release the families confined at Dilley pending their appeals. The continued detention of these children and mothers violates well-established law regarding the treatment of immigrant children, as reflected in the Flores Settlement Agreement. CARA Managing Attorney, Katie Shepherd explains, “Under Flores, the government may not hold children in unlicensed, secure detention centers like Dilley. The children should be released immediately, with their mothers, as the law requires. The plight of these families, victims of ICE’s recent raids, highlights more pervasive problems with our immigration system. The Obama Administration’s troubling approach toward refugee families needs to be rethought, beginning with the immediate closure of its current family detention centers.”

The CARA Project team served as the last hope for these families. Their successful stays of deportation raise serious concerns about the glaring due process violations that deprive bona fide asylum seekers of a meaningful opportunity to present their claims. Every single mother for whom the CARA Project filed an appeal had been denied due process in one or more ways, including:

  • Cases thrown on a “rocket docket,” leaving no time for their attorneys, if they were able to secure legal representation, to compile the evidence required;
  • Lack of information on what the process was and what their obligations were;
  • Officials pressuring them to sign legal documents without access to counsel;
  • Arrest and detention after they had cooperated with every single requirement ICE had mandated.

The government’s decision to round up Central American families over New Year’s weekend and its refusal to disavow such aggressive enforcement tactics against vulnerable mothers and children continues to reverberate across the United States and beyond. President Obama must fully acknowledge that these families deserve humanitarian protection rather than punishment. The Obama Administration has consistently refused to recognize and treat these families as refugees and has erected enormous obstacles again and again in an effort to deter future asylum seekers. This is a shameful choice that contradicts our own laws and our history as a nation of immigrants.

CARA looks forward to receiving details from the government regarding plans to partner with the United Nations to assist refugees fleeing Central American violence. But, in order to live up to our country’s values and principles, real solutions need to be sought and implemented for those fleeing violence who reach our borders, including meaningful access to counsel and full due process, as well as an immediate end to family detention. Additionally, the administration should immediately protect this vulnerable population from deportation by granting humanitarian parole, Temporary Protected Status, or another form of relief.

*The CARA Pro Bono Project is a partnership of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network (CLINIC), the American Immigration Council (Council), Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services (RAICES), and the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), that provides legal representation and undertakes advocacy on behalf of mothers and children held in federal family detention centers.

13
January 2016

This Bulletin explains how the Asylum Division has prioritized the adjudication of affirmative applications for asylum. On December 26, 2014, we began prioritizing asylum applications for interview scheduling as follows:

1.) Applications that were scheduled for an interview, but the interview had to be rescheduled at the applicant’s request or the needs of USCIS;

2.) Applications filed by children; and

3.) All other pending affirmative asylum applications in the order they were received, with oldest cases scheduled first.

Generally, applicants in the first and second categories are scheduled promptly.

The table below lists how the asylum offices are currently scheduling asylum interviews for applications pending in the third category. It provides the filing dates (month and year) of most asylum applications scheduled for local interviews during that particular month. We have created this system to provide applicants in the third category an estimate for when they might expect their interview to be scheduled. The approximations provided in the table are based on interviews scheduled during the listed month and future movement will be determined by each office’s caseload and resources. For example, in June 2015, the Arlington Asylum Office conducted interviews for applications filed in August 2013. It currently does not include asylum interviews occurring outside of the eight asylum offices or the Boston sub-office (e.g. interviews occurring on circuit rides). Asylum offices schedule circuit ride interviews as resources permit. Please contact the asylum office with jurisdiction over your case for more detailed information.

Asylum Office Directors have the discretion to consider applicants’ requests for urgent interview scheduling outside of the above prioritization categories on a case-by-case basis. Please submit any urgent interview scheduling requests in writing to the asylum office with jurisdiction over your case. Go to the USCIS Service and Office locator page for contact information.

Please Note: The table does not include interviews for Form I-881, Application for Suspension of Deportation or Special Rule Cancellation of Removal (Pursuant to Section 203 of Public Law 105-100 (NACARA).

Interview Schedule for Affirmative Asylum Applicants in Category 3

This chart will be updated monthly. Please check back for updated information.

If you live under
the jurisdiction of…

We scheduled
interviews in…

For people
who filed in…

Arlington, VA

December 2015

September 2013

November 2015

September 2013

October 2015

August 2013

Chicago, IL*

December 2015

May 2013

November 2015

May 2013

October 2015

May 2013

Houston, TX*

December 2015

April – May 2014

November 2015

April – May 2014

October 2015

April – May 2014

Los Angeles, CA*

December 2015

August 2011

November 2015

August 2011

October 2015

August 2011

Miami, FL*

December 2015

April 2013

November 2015

February 2013

October 2015

February 2013

Newark, NJ

December 2015

June 2013

November 2015

June 2013

October 2015

May - June 2013

New York, NY

December 2015

June 2014

November 2015

May 2014

October 2015

Feb. – March 2014

San Francisco, CA

December 2015

November 2013

November 2015

October 2013

October 2015

September 2013

* Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles and Miami have been scheduling interviews in the first two categories due to high volumes in those categories as well as in the credible and reasonable fear caseloads.

Last Reviewed/Updated: 01/11/2016